The war in Ukraine is a suicide for Europe, to the point where it might be the result of a trap set by the Americans and British to maintain Western hegemony. The war was caused by NATO’s encroachment, which provoked Putin’s reaction, later sold to the masses as the cause rather than the consequence. Ukraine had long been in a deep identity crisis, torn between its Soviet history and its European dream. For years, Kyiv oscillated between these two influences until the Americans slyly started to intervene, seizing the opportunity to place military bases close to Moscow and make tons of money in case of war, as is their long-standing tradition. Suspicions of a trap are further fueled by the involvement of the British, Washington’s ironclad allies. England has always been a fierce enemy of Russia, and it was that blonde chimpanzee Boris Johnson who sabotaged the Minsk peace agreements of 2022 after years of fanning the flames. The same primate responsible for Brexit, and a staunch foe of a united Europe. It’s well known that the subjects of Her Majesty cannot come to terms with their imperial decline, and they saw in Ukraine an opportunity for a last-ditch effort: two birds with one war. Hit Russia but also weaken Europe by breaking its ties with Moscow—ties that had been strengthened in recent decades at political, economic, and cultural levels, with many ambitious projects underway.
Russia had progressively opened up, and Europe had responded, even if only out of convenience. Growing dependence on Russian energy resources and cooperation smelled of a nascent Eurasia, an entity that threatened to disrupt the geopolitical balance established after World War II, made even more unpalatable by the rise of China. And there lies the trap: exploiting Ukraine’s internal crisis to break the bonds between Russia and Europe and maintain Western hegemony under the guise of NATO. A strategy that is working. Politically, Europe is hitting rock bottom, and instead of investing in its own development, it is wasting immense public resources on weapons, to the point where rearmament has resumed, much to the delight of the Anglo-Saxon arms industry. Europe is also suffering severe economic repercussions due to the war. One of the main causes of Germany’s serious crisis, for example, is the high cost of energy needed to keep its heavy industries running. Lost opportunities and markets, embargoes, and sanctions are being paid for by all Europeans, while Russia has replaced us with other clients. Real geniuses. We are at war against our own interests, digging our own grave.
Meanwhile, the Anglo-Saxons have also managed to increase tensions with the BRICS countries because their forbidden dream remains a confrontation with China. This trap has already caused a million deaths on both sides, reduced Ukraine to rubble, and yet there is no way out in sight. And instead of stopping and rethinking, the new European Parliament authorizes long-range missiles and signs off on more billion-dollar checks for that other genius, Zelensky, and his peace plan, which consists of waging more war. All to the thunderous applause of the Anglo-Saxons and the masses who bought the fairy tale of the boogeyman and human rights. Sure, Putin is far from a saint and has a czarist view of democracy, but precisely because of this, the European geniuses should have stayed at the table to find a smart agreement. Given its geographical position and the fact that both Moscow—and Washington—are still stuck in a Risk-style approach to geopolitics, Ukraine should have remained neutral and thus out of NATO. Even its entry into the EU should have been gradual, after over a thousand years of history intertwined with Russia. Such an accession should have been conditioned on a peaceful resolution to the crisis, not as a reward at the end of the bloodbath. What was needed was an agreement aimed at reassuring Russia rather than subduing it. Europe needed to be politically clear-headed and present, preventing the Anglo-Saxons from sowing discord, and, consistent with its history, should have pursued diplomacy to safeguard its own interests and prevent the risk of World War III.
