by Diego Fusaro
And now the buffoon of Kiev, Zelensky, the NATO actor, a product cultivated in the labs of Washington if not Hollywood (the highest-paid actor of all time), is openly speaking of a possible end to the war in 2025. In other words, the buffoon is more or less openly acknowledging that the conflict could soon conclude, even if he naturally avoids making it explicit that this end might come in the form of Ukraine’s defeat. Let’s clarify: Zelensky is not defending Ukraine but rather sacrificing it on the altar of American imperialism—an imperialism that uses Ukraine itself as a tool of war against Putin’s Russia. Russia’s “crime” is its refusal to bow down to the new liberal-Atlanticist world order while instead promoting a much-needed multipolar world, free from the unipolar dominance of the burger-loving civilization.
Furthermore, it is worth recalling that historically, every “Russian campaign” has ended in disaster for those who dared embark on such an endeavor. Let’s not forget that with Donald Trump’s recent election, it genuinely seems that things could swiftly change, as the flamboyant blonde who drives the world wild seems to have no interest in prolonging this disastrous war, which has brought endless suffering to the Ukrainian people and, let’s not shy away from admitting, to our own Europe. Europe is battered by the sanctions against Russia (the first historical case where sanctions harm the imposer more than the target) and by the continuous financial and military aid sent into the abyss for the buffoon of Kiev.
As for us, we fervently hope that the war ends as soon as possible so that the torments inflicted on the Ukrainian people and our Europe may cease, and also so that the budding multipolar world order, promoted by those non-aligned sovereign states like Russia, China, and Iran, will not be jeopardized. These states are resisting Western globalization, which would be more accurately termed anglobalization or a forced Americanization of the entire planet. This process condemns the world to submit to the nihilistic model of a West that should now be better called the “declining West,” given its clear destructive nature that not only devastates others but also consumes itself.
